|

press
clips
summer
academy
currently
on
workshops
|
 |
 |
 |
However,
the perspective of the exhibition is broad and goes beyond
private views. The pictures and the objects should be seen
in a global connection. Even limited environmental disasters
can indirectly affect the whole planet. Likewise civilization
will be suffering when nature is destroyed. Maha and Ibrahim
claim that there is only one civilization as there is only
one planet. That is a point of view that one should think
of when some polemicists talk about "a clash of civilizations".
Nature is changing all the time and human actions, good or
evil, can change the living conditions. When Maha and Ibrahim
sent an inquiry about what had happened to their once so flourishing
garden in Baghdad, they got a letter telling them that the
trees had withered away and the fruits shrunken. Such things
make lasting impressions and maybe art can be a way of handling
the feelings just as it can help to investigate the past.
Neither Maha nor Ibrahim remains attached to their personal
memories but they go on to a point that can be called Beyond
100 degrees centigrade. In his essay Art and Environment or
The Game of Burning Stones Ibrahim Rashid who is not only
a creative artist but also an art critic relates Maha Mustafa's
childhood memory of the flaming stones.
|
|
When
Maha was ten she and her parents visited Karkouk in North Iraq.
Together with other children she was dancing and playing at a place
where the soil was rich in oil. When the children were throwing
stones at the ground the stones flamed up. The "magic fire" can,
according to Ibrahim, be interpreted as an aesthetic invention by
nature. "Is this art?", we wonder and answer, "Yes, it is", after
quoting Picasso, "I didn't invent cubism, I just discovered itŠ"
Of course you can't repress the fact that nowadays there are mass
destruction weapons enabled to exterminate the world over and over
again. Nature nihilists argue in favor of abandoning vain efforts
to preserve an environment which still can't represent its originality.
According to such approach the talk about original nature seems
inconsistent. Of course this nihilism has been met by a counter-offensive
in defense of environmental protection. ...Besides there are chaos-ecologists
who claim that the well-balanced landscape is pure fiction while
other thinkers dismiss the basic principles of nature conservation
as historical and social constructions.
Nevertheless it can be said that the opinion of environment protection
keeps up with the opponents. But the conditions are more complicated
than before. An art interacting with such debates in this way is
far from being a matter of course. Regarding art and the view of
the artists you may say that the Renaissance laid the foundations
of the art view that reached its peak with modernism. But the reproduction
technique of today has gradually changed and even undermined the
authority of art. ŠTheir artistic careers have changed fast in the
course of time, but new ways of expression characterized by the
Post Modernism of the Western World combined with their own experiences
make it hard to place them into any existing category. |
Maha
and Ibrahim who first met at the Academy of Art in Baghdad
have since then worked together in some kind of continuous
dialogue, even if their ways of expression differ obviously.
While Maha concentrates on sculpture, Ibrahim is above all
a painter. However, when they exhibit together they present
pictures and objects in such a way that a fascinating varied
whole is formed. Nature and culture collide and something
quite new arises. Previously Maha has worked with natural
objects but now she also often uses artificial materials.
In some of the works "without title", seaweed, roots and other
natural objects are enclosed in plastics. In that way Nature
is enclosed by "skins" produced by civilization. It can remind
us of the fact that nature is transformed by human beings,
but also that it lives deep in the human mind.
Ibrahim's way of painting has changed a great deal since his
first years in Europe in the direction of a more expressive
abstraction combined with a more intensified interest in fragmentation.
He likes to work with square canvases which he can combine
into bigger pictures.
The importance of the parts for the whole impression is something
that both artists are very much conscious of. When they are
preparing for an exhibition it is a comprehensive project
that starts, where the works undergo a second birth when forming
a greater mosaic whole in the gallery. In her installation
"Field", Maha works with 8 000 bulbs which gives an illusion
of an internal fire. The small bulbs are covered by a thick
layer of semi-transparent material.
The effect is striking and gives an impression of smoldering
scenery. It's some kind of realized dream, a conjuring trick,
but also an illustration of human ideas of nature. But more
than that. As a matter of fact there is a whole series of
associations that start moving in harmony with the paintings
by Ibrahim Rashid which have been placed above the illuminated
field. As a negative of her work Maha has created a black
form which seems to absorb all light. It's like a vortex,
a black hole where all substance could disappear, be transformed
or transported.
As Gaston Bachelard the French philosopher, wrote about fire
in his pioneering work, fire is the most dialectic of all
sources of pictures. "It alone is both a subject and an object."
It is the heat that is the proof of the richness of the substance.
From that follows the human fascination of the flame, the
blaze, the light. But at the same time fire concentrates a
number of contrasts. "To be conscious of burning that is to
cool down, to experience intensity, that is to diminish it:
you must have intensity without knowing it. That is the acting
person's bitter law."
|
|
|
|
Moreover
there are a lot of complexes related to the metaphysics of fire,
the fire of passions generating neuroses but also a source of
poetry. It is somewhere in the space of emotions that the flaming
field puts the onlooker. Life is full of paradoxes which leave
their marks on our ways of perceiving nature and the material
world, just think of the old alchemical conception that you had
to destroy the metals to be able to produce them. Ibrahim Rashid's
Landscape without Boundary is a series of paintings welled out
of an intensive conception of the world, but they are pictures
not to be seen just as emotional expressions. Sure, the script
of the brush is there like the seismographic imprint of a state
of mind but the pictures visualize something beyond that, something
exceeding the individual. When the twelve square canvases are
put together to form a large picture, there is a white vacant
field left in the middle. You may reflect on that vacancy. What
is it? What you see depends on how you read pictures and your
convictions. Where somebody sees God, someone else sees nothing,
and a third person doesn't find that contradictory.
 |
These days Ibrahim uses the color of white more often than he
used to. He uses it to paint overlaying layers. At the same time
as he brings light he hides some thing. A shining paradox. I remember
when I met Maha and Ibrahim for the first time. Then they were
living in Malmö. Their studio was filled with colors and forms.
The new studio where Maha and Ibrahim today show their latest
works is large, light and airy certainly a must if your works
are large-sized, as theirs often are nowadays. No process is so
hard to understand as that of inspiration. For some time the idea
of the inspired artist was generally turned down as a romantic
myth and at a certain time perhaps it was necessary to illustrate
other sides of artistry. Just inspiration is never enough if you
want to create art. Knowledge and technical competence are needed.
However, merely craftsmanship will not do to make art that will
touch other people and arouse their interest. Maha's and Ibrahim's
knowledge of materials is solid and their formal skills are great.
Moreover they have the tireless ambition to achieve renewal of
their means of expression. There is a distinct link between Maha
Mustafa's sculpture "Three Sails in the Sun" in Bjärred Square
(1994) and the objects she has just finished in the studio. There
is another appearance now but the concentration of the finished
style is easily recognizable and so is the simplicity which makes
the mysterious seem natural and obvious. Also in Ibrahim Rashid's
painting you find an aesthetically reliable attitude. Coats of
paint are added while the world is expressed in an incessant new
range of nuances, in most cases nature's own colors. Ibrahim doesn't
depict, he transforms, shaping interesting innovative structures.
As Werner Aspenström puts it in his poem Eyewitness: "You can't
step twice into the same flood of light". You always discover
something new every time you look at Ibrahim's pictures. Often
light-conditions make the experiences differ. He likes to experiment
with unconventional materials e.g. car-enamel paint as a complementary
color to earth and vegetative colors form. The alchemists sought
for real gold and according to the myth, the stone that would
make the transformation perfect could be found in the gutter.
There is an old proverb saying, "All is not gold that glitters"
and maybe that is what the artist will show us. What does the
progress of man really mean to nature? This is art that makes
us conscious of environmental problems, putting relevant questions
rather than solving problems. While looking at Maha's lotus flowers
you find natural objects in a scientific context. Here nature
is enclosed by civilization. They are strange beautiful plants
but they seem to have become set in a fixed mould and by laser
light fibre optics they get energy and Life can rise again in
a polluted environment.
I have written a little about the historical perspective but it
is important to point out that Maha Mustafa and Ibrahim Rashid
concentrate on the future in their art. What they are trying to
attain is expressions that are more concerned with the future
than with the past. They know that it is illusive or even destructive
entirely to become absorbed in history. By consistently exploring
new possibilities the limits are moved. There is an almost utopian
feeling in this. It is a question of understanding the whole thing
and finding the right way, Ultimately Maha Mustafa's and Ibrahim
Rashid's art is a project of liberty and independence where the
field of vision is widening and the dialogue is deepening. There
is a firm conviction in their creative art, a conviction that
art can be a means of understanding themselves as well as the
world. They can give a vision of destruction but they can also
show us that there is hope as long as people still have the ability
to dream, think and create.
Excerpt from an article written in the book "Beyond 100° C" Published
in Sweden 2002
Clemens
Altgård
(born 1959). Poet, and writer, literature and art critic in Sydsvenska
Dagbladet. He is also working with the Swedish magazine 00-tal.2
|
|